Concepciones en los paradigmas de la androginia y los diferentes estilos de mando
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23857/dc.v4i3%20Especial.546Palabras clave:
directivos, androginia, estilos de mando, estilos de trabajo, razonamiento moral.Resumen
Aunque la idea de liderazgo andrógina ha sido discutida con frecuencia en la literatura de gestión y en muchos escenarios sean estos, de tipo empresarial o gubernamental, poco se ha hecho para apoyar y justificar su integración de manera conceptual. La mayoría de las investigaciones sobre el liderazgo y los nuevos estilos de trabajo han ignorado las mujeres o en sus resultados mós subliminares se han centrado en las diferencias de sexo y en los principales estilos de mando. En la presente investigación se aportan elementos concluyentes, que validan que el sexo biológico no es un factor importante en la determinación de la efectividad, auto-percepción y estilo de gestión de los líderes y directivos actuales.
Citas
Acker, S. (Ed.) (1989). Teachers, gender, and careers. New York: Falmer.
Appelbaum, S. H., Audet, L. y Miller, J. C. (2003). Gender and leadership? Leadership and gender? A journey through the landscape of theories. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. Vol. 24, 43-51
Aries, E.: 1977, ‘Interaction Patterns and Themes of Male, Female and Mixed Groups’, in A. G. Sargent (Ed.) Beyond Sex Roles (West, Boston, Ma) (Spring).
Bales, R. F.: 1951, Interaction Process Analysis (Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA).
Bales, R. F.: 1970, Personality and Interpersonal Behaviour (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York).
Barbuto, Jr. J., E., Fritz, S., M., Matkin, G., S. y Marx, D., B. (2007). Effects of Gender, Education, and Age upon Leaders’ Use of Influence Tactics and Full Range Leadership Behaviors. Sex Roles. Vol. 56, 71-83.
Bartol, K. M. and Butterfield, D. A.: 1976, ‘Sex Effects in Evaluating Leaders’, Journal of Applied Psychology 61, pp. 446–54.
Bass, M. y Avolio, B. (1992). Developing transformational leadership: 1992 and beyond. Journal of European Industrial Training. Vol. 14, 21–37.
Bem, S. L.: 1974, ‘The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 42, pp. 155–62.
Boullard, P. D. and Cook, P. E.: 1975, ‘Sex and Work Style of Leaders and Followers: Determinants of Productivity’, Psychological Reports 36, pp. 545–6.
Carless, S. A. (1998). Gender differences in transformational leadership: An examination of superior, leader, and subordinate perspectives. Sex Roles. Vol. 39, 887–902.
Chliwniak, L. (1997). Higher education leadership: Analyzing the gender gap. ASHE– ERIC Higher Education Report, 25.
Druskat, V. (1994). Gender and leadership style: Transformational and transactional leadership in the Roman Catholic Church. Leadership Quarterly. Vol. 5, 99–119.
Eagly, A. H. y Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 108, 233–256.
Eagly, A. H. y Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A metaanalysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholog y, Vol. 60, 685– 710.
Fallon, B. J. and Hollander, E. P.: 1976, ‘Sex-Role Stereotyping in Leadership: A Study of Undergraduate Discussion Groups’, a paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.
Filley, A. C.: 1977, ‘Conflict Resolution: The Ethic of the Good Loser’, in R. C. Houseman et al. (Eds.) Readings in Interpersonal and Organizational Communication (3rd Ed.) (Holbrook, Boston).
Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hackman, M. Z., Furniss, A. H., Hills, M. J. y Paterson, T. J. (1992). Perceptions of gender-role characteristics and transformational and transactional leadership behaviours. Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 75, 311–319.
Komives, S. R. (1991). Gender differences in the relationship of hall directors’ transformational and transactional leadership and achieving styles. Journal of College Student Development, Vol. 32, 155–165.
Lockheed, M. E. and Hall, K. P.: 1976, ‘Conceptualizing Sex as a Status Characteristic: Applications to Leadership Training Strategies’, Journal of Social Issues 32, pp. 11–124.
Lockheed, M. E.: 1977, ‘Cognitive Style Effects on Sex Status in Student Work Groups’, Journal of Educational Psychology 69, pp. 158–65.
OECD (2015), Education at a Glance Interim Report: Update of Employment and Educational Attainment Indicators, OECD, Paris, www.oecd.org/edu/EAG-Interim-report.pdf.
Petty, M. M. and Miles, R. H.: 1976, ‘Leader Sex Role Stereotyping in a Female Dominated Work Culture’, Personnel Psychology 29, pp. 393–404.
Powell, G. N. and Butterfield, D. A.: 1984, ‘If Good Managers†are Masculine, What are Bad Managers�’, Sex Roles 10, pp. 477–84.
Riger, S. and Galligan, P.: 1980, ‘Women in Management: An Exploration of Competing Paradigms’, American Psychologist 35, pp. 902–10.
Robie, E. A.: 1973, ‘Challenge to Management’, in E. Ginzberg and A. Yohalem (Eds.) Corporate Lib: Women's Challenge to Management (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).
Schyns, B. y Sanders, K. (2005). Exploring gender differences in leaders’ occupational self-efficacy. Women In Management Review. Vol. 20, 513 – 523.
Wolfram, H.J., Mohr, G. y Schyns, B. (2007). Professional respect for female and male leaders: influential gender-relevant factors. Women In Management Review. Vol. 22. 19 – 32.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Authors retain copyright and guarantee the Journal the right to be the first publication of the work. These are covered by a Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
