Tratamiento temprano de mordida cruzada anterior: revisión de la literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23857/dc.v8i3.2881Palabras clave:
Terapia, Maloclusión de Angle Clase III, Niño, Mordida Cruzada anteriorResumen
Objetivo: Analizar la información actual sobre el tratamiento temprano de la mordida cruzada anterior. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó una revisión bibliogrófica no sistemótica en las bases digitales: BVS Regional y PubMed de las que se extrajeron 34 artículos científicos publicados de los íºltimos cinco años y que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. Resultados: Se revisaron y analizaron los estudios referentes al tratamiento temprano de mordida cruzada anterior cuyos principales hallazgos fueron diagnóstico diferencial, tratamiento temprano, protocolos de atención y eficacia del tratamiento. Conclusión: El anólisis del tratamiento temprano de la mordida cruzada anterior es relevante debido a que permite conocer el enfoque de atención actual para abordar de manera temprana y prevenir o disminuir las afecciones físicas y psicoemocionales que provocan estas alteraciones. Diferentes protocolos de atención se encontraron en esta revisión que tienen efectos esqueléticos y dentoalveolares para la resolución de la maloclusión. Sin embargo, se debe tener en cuenta factores genéticos y ambientales que tienen efectos negativos en el resultado del tratamiento.
Citas
Al-Mozany, S. A., Dalci, O., Almuzian, M., Gonzalez, C., Tarraf, N. E., & Ali Darendeliler, M. (2017). A novel method for treatment of Class III malocclusion in growing patients. Progress in Orthodontics, 18(1), 2-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0192-y
Alzabibi, B. A., Burhan, A. S., Hajeer, M. Y., & Nawaya, F. R. (2021). Short-term effects of the orthodontic removable traction appliance in the treatment of skeletal class iii malocclusion: A randomized controlled trial. Dental and Medical Problems, 58(2), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/126304
Angelieri, F., Ruellas, A., Yatabe, M. ., Cevidantes, L. H. ., Franchi, L., Toyama- Hino, C., De Clerck, H. J., Nguyen, T., & McNamara, J. (2017). Zygomaticomaxillary suture maturation: Part II—The influence of sutural maturation on the response to maxillary protraction. Physiology & behavior, 176(3), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12191.Zygomaticomaxillary
Chaimongkol, P., Thongudomporn, U., & Lindauer, S. J. (2018). Alveolar bone response to light-force tipping and bodily movement in maxillary incisor advancement: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthodontist, 88(1), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.2319/070717-449.1
Ciavarella, D., Mastrovincenzo, M., Tepedino, M., Laurenziello, M., Guida, L., Montaruli, G., Troiano, G., & Muzio, L. Lo. (2018). Early treatment of pseudo class III malocclusion with modified swallowing occlusal contact intercept appliance (S.O.C.I.A.). Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow, 36(September). https://doi.org/10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD
Eissa, O., ElShennawy, M., Gaballah, S., ElMehy, G., & El-Bialy, T. (2018). Treatment of Class III malocclusion using miniscrew-anchored inverted Forsus FRD: Controlled clinical trial. Angle Orthodontist, 88(6), 692-701. https://doi.org/10.2319/110717-760.1
Galeotti, A., Martina, S., Viarani, V., Franchi, L., Rongo, R., D’Antí², V., & Festa, P. (2021). Cephalometric effects of Pushing Splints 3 compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class III malocclusion children: A randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Orthodontics, 43(3), 274-282. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaa076
Gonzales, L., Mena, G., Sarmient, Y., Eredis, W., & Romero, L. (2018). Anomalías dentomaxilofaciales de la atención primaria de salud en escolares de 6-12 años Dentomaxillofacial anomalies of primary health care in schoolchildren aged 6-12 years. Revista Mí©dica. Granma, 2018(1), 12-25. file:///C:/Users/Zona Info/Downloads/775-3627-1-PB.pdf
Jang, S. J., Choi, D. S., Jang, I., Jost-Brinkmann, P. G., & Cha, B. K. (2018). Quantitative comparison of incisal tooth wear in patients receiving one-phase or two-phase treatment for skeletal Class III malocclusion with anterior crossbite. Angle Orthodontist, 88(2), 151-156. https://doi.org/10.2319/080817-532.1
Ji, L. L., Sun, D. X., Shi, L. B., Kyung, H. M., Bing, L., & Wu, X. P. (2020). Morphological changes of frankel functional regulator iii in mixed dentition with class iii malocclusion. International Journal of Morphology, 38(4), 1053-1059. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022020000401053
Kwak, H.-J., Park, H.-J., Kim, Y.-J., & Lee, D.-Y. (2018). Factors associated with long-term vertical skeletal changes induced by facemask therapy in patients with Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthodontist, 88(2), 157-162. https://doi.org/10.2319/042717-282.1
Lim, L. I., Choi, J. Y., Ahn, H. W., Kim, S. H., Chung, K. R., & Nelson, G. (2021). Treatment outcomes of various force applications in growing patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion: A comparative lateral cephalometric study. Angle Orthodontist, 91(4), 449-458. https://doi.org/10.2319/090320-768.1
Lira, A. L. S., & Fonseca, G. H. A. (2019). Anterior crossbite malocclusion: Prevalence and treatment with afixed inclined plane orthodontic appliance. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, 18(2019), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.20396/BJOS.V18I0.8657251
Liu, Y., & Yang, K. (2021). Three-dimensional changes in the upper airway and craniomaxillofacial morphology of patients with Angle Class III malocclusion treated with a Frankel III appliance. BMC Oral Health, 21(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-02013-0
Machado, J. I. A., Andrade, N. S., Silva, R. N. C., Rego, M. V. N. N. do, Moura, L. de F. A. de D., Moura, W. L. de, & Lima, M. de D. M. de. (2020). Is low income associated with malocclusion in primary dentition among preschoolers? Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada, 20, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/pboci.2020.042
Martina, R., D’Antí², V., De Simone, V., Galeotti, A., Rongo, R., & Franchi, L. (2020). Cephalometric outcomes of a new orthopaedic appliance for Class III malocclusion treatment. European Journal of Orthodontics, 42(2), 187-192. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz037
Miamoto, C. B., Marques, L. S., Abreu, L. G., & Paivac, S. M. (2018a). Comparison of two early treatment protocols for anterior dental crossbite in the mixed dentition: A randomized trial. Angle Orthodontist, 88(2), 144-150. https://doi.org/10.2319/052117-344.1
Miamoto, C. B., Marques, L. S., Abreu, L. G., & Paivac, S. M. (2018b). Impact of two early treatment protocols for anterior dental crossbite on children’s quality of life. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 23(1), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.1.071-078.oar
Montinaro, F., Nucci, L., Carfora, M., D’Apuzzo, F., Franchi, L., & Perillo, L. (2021). Modified SEC III protocol: Vertical control related to patients’ compliance with the chincup. European Journal of Orthodontics, 43(1), 80-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjaa030
Navarrete, E. N., & Sobral Pita, A. M. (2020). Factores relacionados con maloclusiones en niños ecuatorianos de 3-9 años de edad. Revista Cubana de Estomatología, 57(2), e2111-e2111. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-7507202000
Ozkalayci, N., & Cicek, O. (2017). When Do Skeletal Class III Patients Wear Their Reverse Pull Headgears? BioMed Research International, 2017, 5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3546262
Pangrazio-Kulbersh, V., Kang, H. K., Dhawan, A., Al-Qawasmi, R., & Pacheco, R. R. (2018). Comparison of early treatment outcomes rendered in three different types of malocclusions. Angle Orthodontist, 88(3), 253-258. https://doi.org/10.2319/091417-618.1
Pavoni, C., Gazzani, F., Franchi, L., Loberto, S., Lione, R., & Cozza, P. (2019). Soft tissue facial profile in Class III malocclusion: Long-term post-pubertal effects produced by the face mask protocol. European Journal of Orthodontics, 41(5), 531-536. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz003
Postnikov, M., Trunin, D., Pankratova, N., Nesterov, A., Sadykov, M., & Ostankov, S. (2018). Orthodontic treatment of malocclusion Class III in patients aged 6—12 by Postnikov appliance, face mask and bracket system. Stomatologiia, 7(960). https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat201897159-62. PMID: 29465079.
Sepp, H., Saag, M., Vinkka-Puhakka, H., Svedstrí¶m-Oristo, A. L., & Peltomí¤ki, T. (2019). Occlusal traits of 4–5-year-old Estonians. Parents’ perception of orthodontic treatment need and satisfaction with dental appearance. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research, 5(3), 199-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.170
Souki, B. Q., Nieri, M., Pavoni, C., Barros, H. M. P., Pereira, T. J., Giuntini, V., Cozza, P., & Franchi, L. (2020). Development and validation of a prediction model for long-term unsuccess of early treatment of Class III malocclusion. European Journal of Orthodontics, 42(2), 200-205. https://doi.org/10.1093/EJO/CJZ031
Tuba, T., Kaygisiz, E., Erkun, S., & Yukse, S. (2018). Treatment with facemask and removable upper appliance versus modified tandem traction bow appliance : the effects on mandibular space. European Journal of Orthodontics, October 2017, 372-377. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx073
Ventura, I., Jorge, J. M., Barata, A. R., & Kizi, G. (2019). Prevalencia de maloclusión en dentición temporal en preescolares del municipio de Porto de Mós (Portugal). Rcp, 5(1), 89-101. https://periodicos.ufrn.br/rcp/article/view/18255
Wendl, B., Kamenica, A., Droschl, H., Jakse, N., Weiland, F., Wendl, T., & Wendl, M. (2017). Retrospective 25-year follow-up of treatment outcomes in Angle Class III patients Success versus failure. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics, 78(2), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-016-0075-8
Wendl, B., Muchitsch, A., Winsauer, H., Gualterio, A., Droschl, H., N.Jakse, Wendl, M., & Wendl, T. (2017). Retrospective 25-year follow-up of treatment outcomes in angle Class III patients Early versus late treatment. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics, 78(3), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-016-0076-7
Wendl, B., Stampfl, M., Muchitsch, A. P., Droschl, H., Winsauer, H., Walter, A., Wendl, M., & Wendl, T. (2017). Long-term skeletal and dental effects of facemask versus chincup treatment in Class III patients A retrospective study. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics, 78(4), 293-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-017-0083-3
Willmann, J. H., Nienkemper, M., Tarraf, N. E., Wilmes, B., & Drescher, D. (2018). Early Class III treatment with Hybrid-Hyrax – Facemask in comparison to Hybrid-Hyrax-Mentoplate – skeletal and dental outcomes. Progress in Orthodontics, 19(1), 0-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0239-8
Xu, F. Y., Kwon, T. G., Rong, H., Kyung, H. M., Bing, L., & Wu, X. P. (2018). Morphological changes of skeletal class iii malocclusion in mixed dentition with protraction combined activities. International Journal of Morphology, 36(2), 430-434. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022018000200430
Zere, E., Chaudhari, P. K., Sharan, J., Dhingra, K., & Tiwari, N. (2018). Developing Class III malocclusions: Challenges and solutions. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry, 10, 99-116. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S134303
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Authors retain copyright and guarantee the Journal the right to be the first publication of the work. These are covered by a Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
